ANMA Home

Code of Ethics

Top Stories
  Naturopathic Legislative Alert!    NEW!
  Florida Sunrise Report
  
CA Legislation 
   Arizona's Opinion
   Nat. Scandal in AZ
   Nat. School Under Fire
   CNME, "otherwise not
   approved accred. agency"
   History & Demise of CNME
   AANP vs. Hayhurst & ANMA
         AANP Loses Again

27th Annual Convention (7/25/08)        Convention Lecture
    & Workshop Schedule

   Convention Registration Form

Legislation
   Alaska
   Naturopathic State Laws
   Response to the "OAND"
   Washington Legislation

Journal of the American Naturopathic Medical Association (JANMA)
   Vol. 11 No. 3   10/07    NEW!
   Vol. 11 No. 2   06/07
   Vol. 11 No. 1   02/07
   Vol. 10 No. 4   11/06
   Vol. 10 No. 3   07/06
   Vol. 10 No. 2   04/06
   Vol. 10 No. 1   01/06
   Vol. 9 No. 3     10/05
   Vol. 9 No. 2     07/05
   Vol. 9 No. 1     04/05
   Vol. 8 No. 4     12/04
   Vol. 8 No. 2     07/04
   Vol. 8 No. 1     03/04
   Vol. 7 No. 4     12/03
   Vol. 7 No. 3     09/03
   Vol. 7 No. 2     06/03
   Vol. 7 No. 1     04/03
   Vol. 6 No. 4
   Vol. 6 No. 3
   Vol. 6 No. 2
   Vol. 6 No. 1
   Vol. 5 No. 4
   Vol. 5 No. 3
   Vol. 5 No. 2
   Vol. 5 No. 1
   Vol. 4 No. 4
   Vol. 4 No. 3
   Vol. 4 No. 2
   Vol. 4 No. 1

Facts
   History & Demise of CNME
   CNME Bites The Dust!
   Caution Nat. Med. Edu.
   Naturopaths In Denial
   Fraud?
   NH Gov. Cavalier Response
   Ltr. to AANP From NH Leg.
   NCNM Student Remarks
:
       Merry Bern Letter
      
Stephen Sporn
   NCNM Student Report
   Media
   Canada
   Response to the "OAND"
   Naturopathic Lawsuits

      
Lawsuit #1
      
Lawsuit #2
   Licensing Vs. Certification 

ANMA Memorabilia

Application

American Naturopathic
Certification Board

Naturopathic Links

E-mail

 

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

The President's Corner

The Canola Oil 'Urban Legend'

Prostate Problems & Elevated Estrogen

TWO NEW Convention Colors For ANMA Polo Shirts

ANMA Photo I.D. Membership Cards

Healthy Help Through Enzymes

Benefits of a Special Sea Cucumber Extract in Anti-angiogenic Therapy
& RTK Inhibition For Cancer

Bring A Friend To The ANMA Convention

A Call For Validated Research Papers

 

To advertise in the ANMA Monitor or ANMA MONITOR ONLINE
Call: Julie Morgan at (702) 897-7053

 

Please take the time to look over our sponsors!

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

The  President's  Corner

 

By: Jane Carter for Dr. Curtis

Come one, come all, it’s that time again. It’s time to enjoy yourself while increasing your knowledge by attending ANMA’s Annual Convention at the Riviera Hotel in Las Vegas, NV July 29, 30, 31. Enthusiasm is high, and we look forward to seeing you.

All attendees will have the chance to win hundreds of dollars worth of prizes donated by our fine merchants for the "Super Raffle". ANMA will also hold a raffle with prizes including a weekend stay at the Riviera Hotel, Dinner and Show Tickets. Fun for all!

Again this year we have invited political representatives who have an interest in natural health care. We will have the heads of legislative advocacy groups such as Coalition for Natural Health, and Health Keepers Alliance. There will be discussions on current licensing laws, commitment, and practice guidelines.

We highly recommend you maintain an active interest in your future. Non-involvement and non-interest in tracking legislation in your state can be disastrous to your practice. We recommend web site www.statelocalgov.net to monitor such bills. Once you are familiar with the site, it takes only a few moments of your time daily to protect your practice or future practice. If you have any questions please contact us.

We wish to clarify that even though a law was recently passed that we did not support, we will continue to support the Coalition for Natural Health, and Health Keepers Alliance. Even though our position will remain as follows: we do not support any naturopathic bill that differentiates between distant learning and resident school learning. We believe these two organizations attempt to act in your best interest.

On a final note, if you are interested in expressing an opinion regarding the profession, or ANMA, to be published in the Editors column please send to the Monitor at address provided. Each editorial will be considered, however ANMA reserves the right to accept or not accept any editorial submitted.

If you haven’t already made your plans to attend the convention, you should do it today. ANMA Board of Directors will be there to meet each and everyone of you. See you soon!

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

 

The Canola Oil 'Urban Legend'

 

By: Steven Brynoff

 

For more than 20 years, Mediral has provided homeopathic pharmaceuticals to physicians and health care professionals on the leading edge of energetic, 'next-generation' healing. While homeopathy has always been our area of expertise, we also recognize that a body needs a quality source of macro-nutrients to remain healthy, and the average diet suffers severe nutritional deficiencies. Mediral's FATTY ACID COMPLEX is one of the few non-homeopathic products that we offer. It was designed in response to requests from nutritionists for a professional product that would offer their clients a more balanced approach to essential fatty acid supplementation. By including medicinal oils from the Chinese, Ayurvedic and Native American heritages, it becomes more than just an essential fatty acid supplement, it also provides the therapeutic benefits from a variety of oils recognized throughout history for their potent healing effects. Because of the benefits of a combined, multi-disciplinary approach, FATTY ACID COMPLEX quickly became our most popular non-homeopathic product. Canola was selected as the primary oil due to the unique ratio of 2 to 1 Omega-6 to Omega-3, making it an ideal source for essential fatty acids. Due to the rumors surrounding Canola oil, Mediral offers the following in support of the use of Canola oil as a wholesome food with numerous health benefits (with thanks to the many internet sites, research personnel and interviews that were consulted and conducted during our research).

Occasionally there arises an issue that demands our attention. The infamous 'canola e-mail' is one such issue. In an article originally published in the March/April 1996 issue of the health magazine Perceptions entitled 'Blindness, Mad Cow Disease and Canola Oil,', excerpts from John Thomas' book, Young Again: How To Reverse the Aging Process (first published in 1994) leveled an attack against canola oil with a vengeance. Whether driven by malice, superstition or just poor science, this article has appeared in some form or another in e-mails circulating for the last 9 years. While the internet is unquestionably a tremendous medium for the dissemination of information, it has also become the greatest contemporary source of misinformation. While most healthcare professionals don't get their advise from e-mails, this particular e-mail has never failed to stir up controversy in the ranks of the uninformed. After consulting multiple credible sources such as Medline, Pubmed, Merck Index and the CDC archives, Mediral is convinced that the claims in the 'canola e-mail' are a completely unsubstantiated set of lies, hype and innuendo, and canola oil is a safe, legitimate food with multiple health benefits.

 

What is Canola Oil?

Canola is a specially bred variety of rapeseed, and a member of the Brassica family. Other members of this family include turnips, broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, kale and mustard greens.

 

Where Does It Come From?

In the late 1970s, Canola was bred from rapeseed via traditional pedigree hybrid propagation methods (no, it wasn't a gene-splicing process - i.e. GMO or genetically modified organism - although some lines propagated today are). Since most Canola is grown in Canada, the name is an acronym: CANOLA = 'CANadian Oil Low Acid.' Canola oil is also called LEAR oil, for 'Low Erucic Acid Rapeseed.'

 

What Is The Problem With Erucic Acid?

Rapeseed oil originally contained a fat called erucic acid (a 22-carbon fatty acid present in all Brassica family members), which constituted 40-50% of the fatty acid content. These high levels of erucic acid in the original rapeseed were a potential health hazard. The new canola variety is much lower in erucic acid (under 2%). This is not the only case of a dangerous substance having to be removed from a food to make it safe. Before cashew nuts are roasted, they contain a dermatoxin. And cassava, a staple of the Central and South American diet, is full of hydrogen cyanide before it is soaked or heated.

 

Does Canola Oil Reduce Cholesterol?

Studies in Canada, Finland, Sweden and the US have found canola oil is as effective as sunflower, soybean and safflower oil in reducing total and LDL cholesterol levels in both subjects with normal blood lipid levels as well as hyperlipidemic subjects.

 

Is Canola Related to Mustard Gas?

Emphatically NOT! Rumors continue to circulate that rape oil is the source of the chemical warfare agent 'mustard gas,' so Canola must be somehow related to it. The confusion results from rapeseed and Canola being members of the Brassica family - also commonly referred to as the mustard plant family. The truth is, mustard gas has absolutely no relation to any botanical family. Mustard gas is chemically 2,2'-dichlorodiethyl sulfide, is made by treating ethylene with sulfur chloride. It was given the nickname 'mustard gas' because of its yellow color and sulphur odor. These rumors are totally unfounded and there is no relation at all between Canola or rapeseed and mustard gas.

Is Canola Oil Healthy?

Canola oil's fatty acid profile makes it especially beneficial for heart health. You probably remember that there are 3 types of fats: saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated. Two of the three types of fats are 'healthy' fats, saturated fats are the bad type you want to avoid. Canola oil is very low in saturated fatty acids, 6-7% (peanut oil is 18%, and palm oil can be as high as 79% saturated fat content), relatively high in monounsaturated fatty acids (61% oleic acid) and intermediate in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Omega-3 fatty acids, polyunsaturated fats, are reputed to lower cholesterol and triglycerides, and also contribute to brain growth and development. The relatively high levels of omega-3 fatty acids may actually stimulate the immune system. Canola oil's unique ratio of almost 2 to 1 Omega-6 to Omega-3 makes it the richest vegetable oil source of essential fatty acids. (corn oil is approximately 55 to 1 Omega-6 to Omega-3.) Canola does not contain significant amounts of trans fatty acids. Despite the claims in the accompanying e-mail, an extensive search of Medline reveals that there are no research studies linking Canola to human health hazards when consumed as recommended.

 

NOTICE: The following is the text of the infamous 'canola e-mail' that circulates every 12-18 months.

"Recently I bought a cooking oil that's new to our supermarkets, Canola Oil. I tried it because the label assured me it was lowest in "bad" fats. However, when I had used half the bottle, I concluded that the label told me surprisingly little else and I started to wonder: where does canola oil come from? Olive oil comes from olives, peanut oil from peanuts, sunflower oil from sunflowers; but what is a canola? There was nothing on the label to enlighten me, which I thought odd. So, I did some investigating on the Internet.

There are plenty of official Canola sites lauding this new "wonder" oil with all its low-fat health benefits. It takes a little longer to find sites that tell the less palatable details. Here are just a few facts everyone should know before buying anything containing canola. Canola is not the name of a natural plant but a made-up word, from the words "Canada" and "oil". Canola is a genetically engineered plant developed in Canada from the Rapeseed Plant, which is part of the mustard family of plants.

According to AgriAlternatives, The Online Innovation, and Technology Magazine for Farmers, "By nature, these rapeseed oils, which have long been used to produce oils for industrial purposes, are... toxic to humans and other animals". (This, by the way, is one of the websites singing the praises of the new canola industry.)

Rapeseed oil is poisonous to living things and is an excellent insect repellent. I have been using it (in very diluted form, as per instructions) to kill the aphids on my roses for the last two years. It works very well; it suffocates them. Ask for it at your nursery.

Rape is oil used as a lubricant, fuel, soap and synthetic rubber base and as an illuminate for color pages in magazines. It is industrial oil. It is not a food. Rape oil, it seems, causes emphysema, respiratory distress, anemia, constipation, irritability, and blindness in animals and humans. Rape oil was widely used in animal feeds in England and Europe between 1986 and 1991, when it was thrown out. Remember the "Mad Cow disease" scare, when millions of cattle in the UK were slaughtered in case of infecting humans? Cattle were being fed on a mixture containing material from dead sheep, and sheep suffer from a disease called "scrapie". It was thought this was how "Mad Cow" began and started to infiltrate the human chain. What is interesting is that when rape oil was removed from animal feed, 'scrapie' disappeared. We also haven't seen any further reports of "Mad Cow" since rape oil was removed from the feed. Perhaps not scientifically proven, but interesting all the same. US and Canadian farmers grow genetically engineered rapeseed and manufacturers use its oil (canola) in thousands of processed foods, with the blessings of Canadian and US government watchdog agencies.

Except canola means "Canadian oil"; and the plant is still a rape plant, albeit genetically modified. The new name provides perfect cover for commercial interests wanting to make millions. Look at the ingredients list on labels.

Apparently peanut oil is being replaced with rape oil. You'll find it in an alarming number of processed foods. There's more, but to conclude: rape oil was the source of the chemical warfare agent mustard gas, which was banned after blistering the lungs and skins of hundred of thousands. of soldiers and civilians during WWI. Recent French reports again in use during the Gulf War indicate that it was.

If a label says, "may contain canola oil," you know it does because it is the cheapest oil available, and Canadian special interest groups subsidize users.

Here is more information....

The Canadian government and industry paid our Federal FDA $50 million dollars to have canola oil placed on the GRAS ("Generally Recognized As Safe") list. Thus a new industry was created. Laws were enacted affecting international trade, commerce, and traditional diets. Studies with lab animals were disastrous. Rats developed fatty degeneration of heart, kidney, adrenals, and thyroid gland. When canola oil was withdrawn from their diets, the deposits dissolved but scar tissue remained on all vital organs. No studies on humans were made before money was spent to promote Canola oil in the USA.

ALD (Adrenoleukodystrophy) is a rare, fatal degenerative disease caused by a build up long-chain fatty acids (c22 to c28) which destroys the myelin sheath of the nerves. Canola oil is a very long chain fatty acid oil (c22). Those who will defend canola oil say that the Chinese and Indians have used it for centuries with no effect, however it was unrefined. My cholesterol level was 150. After a year using Canola oil I tested 260. I switched back to pure olive oil and it has taken 5 years to get it down to 160. My sister spilled Canola oil on a piece of fabric, after 5 pre-treatings and harsh washings, the oil spot still showed. She stopped using Canola oil, wondering what it did to our insides if it could not be removed from cloth easily. Our Father bred birds, always checking labels to insure there was no rapeseed in their food. He said, "The birds will eat it, but they do not live very long". A friend, who worked for only 9 mos. as a quality control taster at an apple-chip factory where Canola oil was used exclusively for frying, developed numerous health problems. These included loose teeth & gum disease; numb hands and feet; swollen arms and legs upon rising in the morning; extreme joint pain especially in hands, cloudy vision, constipation with stools like black marbles, hearing loss; skin tears from being bumped; lack of energy; hair loss and heart pains. It has been five years since she has worked there and still has some joint pain, gum disease, and numbness. A fellow worker, about 30 years old, who ate very little product, had a routine check up and found that his blood vessels were like those of an 80 year old man. Two employees fed the waste product to baby calves and their hair fell out. After removing the fried apple chips from the diet their hair grew back in. My daughter and her girls were telling jokes. Stephanie hit her mom's arm with the back of a butter knife in a gesture, "Oh mom" not hard enough to hurt. My daughter's arm split open like it was rotten. She called me to ask what could have caused it. I said, "I'll bet anything that you are using Canola oil". Sure enough, there was a big gallon jug in the pantry. Rapeseed oil is a penetrating oil, to be used in light industry, not for human consumption. It contains a toxic substance. Even after the processing to reduce the erucic acid content, it is still penetrating oil. We have found that it turns rancid very fast. Also it leaves a residual rancid odor on clothing. Rapeseed oil smoke causes lung cancer. The Wall Street Journal June 7, 1995 pB6(W) pB6 (E) col 1 (11 col in)."

Above is one version of the infamous 'canola e-mail' that has raised havoc within the natural medical community. After researching the issue thoroughly, Mediral would like to examine some of the more outrageous and irresponsible claims made by John Thomas and this 'Urban Legend' e-mail which still circulates today.

CLAIM: "Rapeseed oil is poisonous to living things. . . and toxic to human beings"

TRUTH: Although Asian and European people have used rapeseed for centuries, the erucic acid contained in unrefined rapeseed oil has been linked to lung cancer when high cooking temperatures are used, as in wok cooking (which traditionally uses temperatures between 240 - 280°F). Heart lesions have also been associated with the high erucic acid content of rapeseed (40 - 50%). These are all reasons rapeseed was never used in the US prior to 1974. The potential health hazards of the erucic acid were eliminated with the introduction of the low erucic acid variety called canola oil (0.5 - 2 % erucic acid content).

CLAIM: "Rape seed causes emphysema, respiratory distress, anemia, constipation, irritability and blindness in animals and humans."

TRUTH: This seems to be an outright lie. There is no indication in any legitimate medical source databases regarding any known or suspected link to any of these conditions. There always exists the possibility of allergic hypersensitivity, but the same is true for any food (i.e. shellfish, peanuts, garlic, etc).

CLAIM: "We haven't seen any further reports of 'Mad Cow' since rape oil was removed from the feed."

TRUTH: This directly implies that Bovine Spongiform Encepholopathy (BSE) is caused by or linked to rape oil. A quick check of credible science references demonstrates conclusively that mad cow disease is directly linked to a rogue protein fragment called a prion (not a virus, bacteria or an oil), and has nothing to do with rapeseed oil. Also noted was the fact that it was rapeseed meal, not the oil, that was used, and it is in fact still used as feed throughout Europe.

CLAIM: "Rape . . . is an industrial oil."

TRUTH: True. Many oils, even corn and soybean, have multiple uses in commercial industry. For example, flax oil is used as industrial oil for paint and linoleum. Olive oil has been used to make soap for centuries. One of the most edible of oils, coconut oil, is used for many industrial products, including soaps and cosmetics.

CLAIM: "The Canadian government and industry paid our Federal FDA $50 million dollars to have canola oil placed on the GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) list."

TRUTH: This is another ludicrous statement that belongs in the category of conspiracy theory. There is absolutely no evidence of this, which, according to conspiracy theorists, is good evidence that the government is hiding it. Sorry to be so light-hearted about this, but it is easy to make claims that can't be proven, and in so doing, introduce an element of irrational doubt to the use of a safe, healthy product.

CLAIM: "Rapeseed oil . . . is an excellent insect repellent."

TRUTH: It is not used as an insect repellent, but it does suffocate insects in a garden setting (just as any oil would suffocate any living thing - this is not due to toxicity, but the properties of oils in general).

CLAIM: "Rape oil was the source of the chemical warfare agent mustard gas, which was banned after blistering the lungs and skins of hundreds of thousands of soldiers during WWI."

TRUTH: This is an example of more alarmist propaganda based on outright lies. Rumors continue to circulate that rape oil is the source of the chemical warfare agent 'mustard gas,' so canola must be somehow related to it. The confusion results from rapeseed and canola being members of the Brassica family - also commonly referred to as the mustard plant family. The truth is, mustard gas, which is chemically 2,2'-dichlorodiethyl sulfide, is made by treating ethylene with sulfur chloride - it doesn't even come from a mustard plant. It was given the nickname 'mustard gas' because of its yellow color and sulphur odor. These rumors are totally unfounded; there is absolutely no relation between canola oil, and rapeseed oil and mustard gas.

CLAIM: "Studies with lab animals were disastrous."

TRUTH: True. The same results were obtained in similar studied conducted with sunflower seed oil. Any study in which the subject's diet is changed from their normal diet (grains, fruits & vegetables in these cases) to a high fat diet is going to result in deteriorating health - this has nothing to do with the canola oil, it has to do with the excess fat content in general. The same thing happens to human beings if their diet suddenly consists of fatty fast foods and snacks - the health consequences are always less than favorable.

CLAIM: "Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a rare fatal degenerative disease caused by a build up long-chain fatty acids (c22 to c28) which destroys the myelin (protective sheath) of the nerves. Canola oil is a very long chain fatty acid oil (c22)."

TRUTH: This implication is a blatant misquote of the intent of Dr. Udo Erasmus in his book, Fats that Heal, Fats that Kill. Quoting from page 117: 'In fact, erucic acid may have some beneficial effects. In recent years, a preparation of 20% erucic and 80% oleic acids, called Lorenzo's Oil after the boy whose condition inspired its development, has been used to treat a rare, fatal degenerative genetic condition known as Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), in which a buildup of very long-chain fatty acids (C22 to C28) destroys the white matter (myelin) in the brain. Erucic acid helps to normalize the levels of these fatty acids...." It wasn't Dr. Erasmus' intent to recommend canola oil, but it certainly wasn't his intent to malign it or implicate it in disease either. How easy it is to mislead if the general public isn't willing to do their homework.

The remainder of the e-mail is a collection of anecdotes and personal observations that are unsubstantiated and impossible to verify. Ah, the stuff that good urban legends are made of. Stories come from second party accounts of "my sister, my father, my friend, my daughter, fellow employees, mom." These claims are hard to argue with, but hardly form the basis for credible science.

As healthcare professionals, it is our responsibility to know the truth. The scientific body of knowledge changes almost daily, and although we must recognize that contrary evidence may be discovered in the future (indeed it is almost proverbial), we must sometimes make decisions based on the current data available. Mediral is convinced from our research that Canola is a wholesome food with many health advantages, but we encourage everyone to do their own research. Thank you.

 

REFERENCES / ESSENTIAL TERMS FOR UNDERSTANDING FATS

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

 

Prostate Problems & Elevated Estrogen

By: Mike Menkes, BA, LMT

 

Men over the age of 45 are surprised to learn that estrogen, a 'female' hormone, is also present in their bodies. Male estrogen is produced in very small quantities, as a by-product of the testosterone conversion process. This process is regulated by an enzyme called aromatase.

 

Balance vs. Imbalance

Balanced levels of estrogen encourage a healthy libido, improve brain function, protect the heart and strengthen the bones. Oestradiol is the most potent oestrogen of a group of steroids which includes oestrone and oestriol. Excessive oestradiol levels can lead to the suppression and

reduced activity of testosterone. Typically, men's oestrogen levels increase with age, and it is not uncommon for a 59 year-old man to have more oestrogen than a 54 year-old woman.

Obesity, pesticides, nutritional deficiencies, prescription medicines and excessive alcohol intake can all raise a man's estrogen levels. When this happens, men frequently lose muscle tone and gain body fat. The end results of high oestrogen for men can include obesity, an enlarged prostate, diabetes and a higher incidence of heart disease and cancer.

 

Prevention of Prostate Cancer

"…studies have shown a strong correlation between consumption of cruciferous vegetables and a lower risk of prostate cancer. These vegetables contain glucosinolates, which during metabolism give rise to several breakdown products, mainly Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C)…"1

 

Natural Prostate Treatment

"It is time to revamp the prostate cancer hypothesis. Orchiectomy [removal of the testicles] provided a prostate cancer benefit not because it removed testicular testosterone but because it lowered estradiol levels.

"The two most important factors in the underlying metabolic imbalance prostate (and all hormone-dependent cancers) are oestrogen dominance and nutritional imbalance. Prevent these two factors and you will prevent the cancer. If the cancer is already underway, correcting the estrogen dominance will slow the cancer growth and prolong life.2

 

Case Studies

1. "In the current study, we investigated whether I3C had any effect against prostate cancer cells and, if so, attempts were made to identify the potential molecular mechanism(s) by which I3C elicits its biological effects on prostate cancer cells. Here we report for the first time that I3C inhibits the growth of PC-3 prostate cancer cells.

Induction of apoptosis was also observed in this cell line when treated with I3C, as measured by DNA laddering and poly (ADP-ribose) polymersae (PARP) cleavage.

From these results, we conclude that I3C inhibits the growth of PC-3 prostate cancer cells by inducing G1 cell cycle arrest leading to apoptosis,

and regulates the expression of apoptosis-related genes. These findings suggest that I3C may be an effective chemopreventive or therapeutic agent against prostate cancer."3

2. "We have previously shown that 3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM – a metabolite of I3C) has a suppressive effect on the growth of human breast and PC cell lines. The objective of this study was examination of the potential therapeutic effects of DIM in an in vivo model. METHODS: TRAMP-C2, a mouse PC cell line, was injected into the flank of male C57BL/6 mice. When tumors appeared, mice were injected intraperitoneally with either corn oil (vehicle) or DIM (2.5, 5, or 10 mg per kg body weight) three times a week, for three weeks, and tumor volumes were measured bi-weekly with calibermeters. Later, the tumors were removed, their final weights and volumes were measured, and tumor sections were tested for histological studies. RESULTS: DIM had a significant inhibitory effect, caused by diminished tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS: The inhibitory action of DIM on tumor growth was demonstrated in vivo. Hence, this compound at the concentrations tested may offer an effective and non toxic therapeutic means against tumour growth in rodents, and may serve as a potential natural anti-carcinogenic compound in humans.4

 

PSA Levels Not A Good Indicator of Cancer

"PSA level was also found to be not an especially good indicator of prostate cancer. If only PSA levels were used, 82 (17.3%) of the 473 cancers found by TRUS would have remained undetected. Moreover, among men with cancer and a PSA level of less than four ng/ml (usually considered a safe level), 42% of the cancers were termed minimal, 42% termed moderate, and 16% were advanced."5

 

Feminizing The Male Patient

"Orchiectomy: This is surgical removal of the testicles, removing the source of male hormones. Prostate cancers typically shrink after removal of the testes. However, over time, the cancer inevitably returns. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists: These medications reduce the amount of testosterone the testicles make. These injectable drugs can decrease the amount of testosterone produced by a man's testicles. The two available in the United States are leuprolide and goserelin. Antiandrogens: Orchiectomy and LHRH agonists do not fully block the production of androgens. Antiandrogens block the effects of those residual androgens, and are often used in combination with Orchiectomy and LHRH agonists in a process called total androgen blockade. The antiandrogens available in the United States are flutamide, nilutamide, and bicalutamide. Female hormones: Di-ethyl stilbesterol (DES) is a synthetic oestrogen often used in prostate cancer."6

 

Serum vs. Saliva Testing

"For reasons that escape rational thinking, conventional medicine persists in using serum tests rather than saliva tests. The results have been disastrous. When using hormone creams or gels, the hormone is absorbed through the skin and into the blood without first passing through the liver. Thus, they are essentially all absorbed in the 'free' form. When given orally, they pass first through the liver and 90% of them become protein-bound. For this reason, transdermal dosing is at least ten times more efficient than oral dosing.

"If one uses serum testing to measure the blood levels achieved by transdermal dosing, the test will fail to measure all the hormone carried by red blood cells. As a consequence, physicians are apt to greatly overdose their patients.

"When using saliva testing, it is found that the transdermal dose of testosterone when treating someone with testosterone deficiency is only 0.25-0.5 mg in women, and one to two mg in men. As the New Yorker article indicated, the transdermal doses of testosterone ranged from five mg to 100 mg a day. The same is observed in estrogen replacement therapy – the doses are generally all greatly excessive. The same hormone that brought good health without side effects when in normal endogenous levels will bring on very bad side effects when given in grossly excessive doses. The problem is not the hormone, per se, the problem is the dosing."7

 

Conclusion

Feminize the Male Patient or Natural Estradiol Reduction?

Prior to enhancement with female hormones, surgery, or radiation, reduction of confirmed elevated estradiol levels, via saliva testing, appears to be the more logical choice from prostate cancer treatment options. Indole-3-Carbinol has shown to be a safe, effective and inexpensive non-prescriptive course of action.

Mike Menkes - PresidentHealth Science Solutions • 4401 Sheridan Street, Hollywood, FL 33021 • 800 432-2254 (954) 252-3962 http://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/ibg/ibg.aspx?li=32763&st=All+Natural+FMG+Inc.

 

REFERENCES

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

 

TWO NEW Convention Colors For ANMA
Embroidered Polo Shirts

As you may already know, ANMA offers a wide assortment of stylish accessories. Many of you have at least one or even two ANMA embroidered polo shirts. In the past ANMA has offered the polo shirts in a variety of colors, white, black, and navy blue. Now, ANMA is introducing two new colors, BURGUNDY & FOREST GREEN. The polo shirts are of excellent quality (heavy 100% cotton with metal buttons) and look absolutely beautiful.

In addition, ANMA has black tote bags with our logo embroidered on the side and lapel pins with optional tie chain. The tote bags and lapel pins cost $15.00 and shipping is provided free of charge (tote bags & lapel pins only).

Every order will be processed and mailed as quickly as possible. All orders will be shipped Priority Mail to ensure speedy delivery. ANMA offers its polo shirts for only $28.00 plus shipping. The sizes we have range from small to triple extra large. If you would like a 2xl or 3xl, please add $1.00 and $2.00 respectively.

If you have any questions or want to place an order, e-mail me at: webmaster@anma.com or call Julie Morgan at (702) 897-7053 or mail to ANMA, P.O. Box 96273, Las Vegas, NV 89193.

NOTE: BE SURE TO ORDER NOW BEFORE THE CONVENTION TO GET THE SIZE AND QUANTITY YOU WANT. THE BURGUNDY AND FOREST GREEN POLOS WILL DEFINITELY BE VERY LIMITED OR EVEN SOLD OUT AFTER THE CONVENTION.

 

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

 

ANMA Photo I.D. Membership Cards

ANMA for the fist time, offers a remarkably new Photo I.D. Membership Card. The fresh new card will be in full color (including picture) and double sided. The front side will have the ANMA insignia, photograph, membership type, member I.D. number, and date joined. The back side of the card is bestowed with ANMA’s Code of Ethics. In addition, the Photo I.D. card is laminated for long lasting durability. The new Photo I.D. Membership Card cost is $15.00 and shipping is free of charge. For more information or to place an order, please call 702-897-7053 or e-mail us at webmaster@anma.com.

 

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

 

Healthy Help Through Enzymes

 

 By: Donna Werner, D.C.

The 20th century saw remarkable gains in wiping out the nutritional scourges of the past, such as scurvy, pellagra and rickets. Certain advancements in the last century also brought about an explosion of chronic, degenerative disorders, including cancer, cardiovascular disease and type-2 diabetes.

Research has proven that many of these conditions can be directly attributed to our modern diets.

Nature endowed us with remarkable digestive mechanisms, many of which are now failing us at an early age. Nature doesn’t typically make mistakes, so why is this happening?

What nature didn’t anticipate was humankind’s increasing reliance upon a diet of cooked and processed food as the primary source of nutrition.

Enzymes for digestion essentially come from two sources: internally from our own digestive organs (digestive enzymes) and externally from the food we eat (food enzymes).

Food enzymes, however, are present in raw food only. Cooking or processing food at temperatures greater than 118 F destroys all of its enzymes and places the entire burden for digestion on the body. The impact of this destruction of food enzymes has been largely overlooked in allopathic medicine.

The pioneering work of Dr. Edward Howell in the 1920s and 1930s led to the current practice of enzyme supplementation.

His research indicated that people were suffering from various chronic diseases, because their bodies were expending so much energy digesting their food, it left them little energy for important metabolic functions. His premise was this: If enzymes that are lost during the cooking and processing of food could be replaced; the body would be spared some of the energy-intensive process of digestion and could devote more of its resources towards maintaining optimum health.

Today, healthcare practitioners in many different disciplines are beginning to recommend enzyme supplements and are noticing improvements in the health of their patients and, subsequently, the profitability of their practices.

In his book, Enzyme Nutrition: The Food Enzyme Concept, Howell states: "The length of life is inversely proportional to the rate of exhaustion of the enzyme potential of an organism. The increased use of food enzymes promotes a decreased rate of exhaustion of the enzyme potential." Howell believed the number of enzymes the body is capable of producing is finite and their depletion leads to chronic conditions and eventually the loss of life.

Based on our current knowledge of genetic predisposition and the effect of stress on organ function in the body, Howell’s premise has merit. The lack of naturally occurring enzymes in food puts undue stress on the pancreas and other enzyme-producing digestive organs to produce all of the enzymes needed for complete digestion of food.

It is well documented that continuous stress on an organ or system of the body will eventually result in diminished functioning of that organ or system.

Since a top priority of the body is obtaining nutrition through digestion, the body’s resources are readily made available to complete this function. If an excessive amount of these resources are constantly used for digestion, the other metabolic functions in the body will suffer.

Therefore, the goal of enzyme supplementation is to relieve the digestive organs of unnecessary stress and allow the body to allocate its valuable resources to maintaining healthier metabolic function.

ANIMAL OR VEGETARIAN?

In order to accomplish this goal, the right enzyme supplements must be used. Enzymes from animal sources, such as pancreatin, are most active in the more alkaline environment of the small intestine (approximate pH 6.0 – 8.0) after the body has already produced enzymes to complete digestion.

This means animal enzyme supplements do nothing to spare the pancreas and other digestive organs from producing excess enzymes.

Vegetarian enzymes, on the other hand, are active over a broad pH range (pH 2.0 to 11.0) so they are able to begin digesting food immediately after entering the stomach.

The presence of digested food in the stomach signals the body to produce fewer enzymes for the digestive process. Vegetarian enzymes, therefore, are a better choice because they relieve the body of some of the burden of digestion.

While nutritional enzyme supplements are available to the consumer at health-food stores, on the Internet and even in the neighborhood pharmacy, the most therapeutically effective supplements are those available only through healthcare practitioners.

These enzymes contain higher potency and are full-spectrum. They would not be appropriate for a self-diagnosing consumer.

Healthcare practitioners, however, are able to assess each patient’s health status and tailor an individualized enzyme supplementation program.

To recommend enzyme supplementation to your patients, follow these guidelines:

• Select vegetarian enzymes. Animal enzymes (pancreatin) and basic plant enzymes (bromelain and papain) concentrate their digestive activity on breaking down protein.

But, vegetarian enzymes from safe, mycological sources provide a full spectrum of enzymes for more complete digestion.

• Include four common enzymes. When selecting an enzyme supplement to recommend, be certain at least the four primary types are present to assure digestion of the main food components.

These enzymes include amylase (starch digestion), cellulase (fibrous foods breakdown), lipase (fatty acid splitting) and protease (protein digestion).

• Consider other enzymes. Many other enzymes, such as glucoamylase, sucrase, lactase, alpha-galactosidase, phytase and peptidase, to name a few, ensure further digestion of all food groups.

• Recommend systemic supplementation. In addition to adding an enzyme supplement to assist with digestion, recommend taking enzyme supplements between meals to reduce inflammation, boost immune function, maintain cardiovascular health, maximize endocrine effectiveness, detoxify and promote normal respiratory function.

This type of enzyme supplementation is referred to as "systemic" and typically uses proteolytic enzymes (proteases).

The 20th century provided medical advancements at a rate unprecedented throughout history. What will the 21st century hold for the health of mankind, and what role will nutritional enzyme supplementation play?

Based on the exceptional clinical results seen thus far, the future of enzyme supplementation proves extremely promising.

Donna Werner, DC, is the Director of Technical Services for Enzymes, Inc., located in Parkville, Mo. For more information call: 800-637-7893 and visit www.enzymesinc.com.

 

 

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

 

Benefits of a Special Sea Cucumber Extract in
Anti-angiogenic Therapy & RTK Inhibition For Cancer

 

By: Tsu-Tsair Chi, N.M.D., Ph.D.

Introduction

Angiogenesis, or the growth of new blood vessels, is involved in such vital processes as wound healing, restoration of blood flow to tissues after injury, and menstruation1-2. However, when the body is unable to control angiogenesis, diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, rheumatoid arthritis, or psoriasis can result3. But more importantly, angiogenesis is central to tumor growth, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis.

When normal tissues are diseased or injured, such as in tumors, different growth factors or proteins are released into the nearby tissues to stimulate angiogenesis. The growth factors subsequently bind to their corresponding receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) within endothelial cells in the blood vessels. This receptor binding results in the activation of the otherwise dormant endothelial cells, causing them to divide and migrate towards the diseased tissues or, in this case, the tumor cells. Adhesion molecules help the growing new blood vessels to sprout forward. These sprouting endothelial cells roll up to form new blood vessel tubes. Ultimately these tubes form a network of new blood vessels that can circulate blood4. With the new blood vessels now feeding it, the tumor can continually grow in size, invade other tissues and facilitate the spread of the cancer to other organs.

Inhibiting angiogenesis at some point in the process is obviously essential to stopping tumor growth. Normally, the body has naturally-occurring angiogenesis inhibitors that try to counter the potentially abnormal effect of growth factors. However, when a tumor reaches a size of about 2 mm in diameter, growth factors are produced in overwhelming amounts and the effect of natural angiogenesis inhibitors is overpowered4. As a result, a cascading process of new blood vessel formation is initiated. One aspect of cancer therapy research, called RTK inhibition, concentrates not necessarily on stopping the overproduction of angiogenesis-related growth factors but in blocking these from binding to their receptors in order to stop the signaling that launches the process of new blood vessel formation.

For more than three decades now, cancer therapy research has tried to find resources-- natural or otherwise-- that can block the angiogenesis process. Researchers have since developed synthetic angiogenesis inhibitors, but they have also found potential angiogenesis inhibitors in natural marine resources, most especially sea cucumbers. Sea cucumbers are delicacies in the South China seas and are known to be rich in nutritional compounds such as polysaccharides5 and lactones6. In the 1990s, scientists have uncovered that sea cucumbers are active inhibitors of angiogenesis as well (U.S. Patent No. 5,985,330). This comes as no surprise to people living in the South China seas. For centuries, sea cucumbers have been considered as an integral part in Chinese folk medicine, primarily used as treatment for stomach ulcer and stomach cancer. The discovery that these natural resources are angiogenesis inhibitors only reinforces their centuries-old history of traditional use. More recently, a research team in China published more concrete evidence that philinopside A (chemical formula C55O22H85SO3Na), extracted from a special sea cucumber species, is not only able to suppress new blood vessel formation but also inhibit RTK binding of growth factors7.

 

The anti-angiogenic and RTK inhibitory functions of Philinopside A

Results of studies by the research team in China revealed that due to philinopside A's significant inhibition of three important stages of angiogenesis (endothelial cell proliferation, migration and tube formation), the formation of new blood vessels was greatly reduced. It was observed that, at various doses, philinopside A inhibited proliferation of human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs) at rates of up to 98.7%. Using the same doses, HMEC migration was also inhibited by as much as 94.1%. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the sprouting of microvessels in cultured rat aortas before and after treatment with philinopside A. After addition of philinopside A, the outgrowth is visibly reduced, indicating that it did block blood vessel formation. In more specific tests, philinopside A was found to inhibit proliferation in several cancer cell lines, including MKN-28 (gastric cancer), SPC-4A (colorectal cancer), HL-60 (leukemia), A-549 (lung tumor), BEL-7402 (liver cancer), MCF-7 (breast cancer), HCT-116 (colorectal cancer) and HO-8910 (ovarian cancer)7.

In subsequent studies, philinopside A produced a more potent anti-angiogenic effect than Suramin, a synthetic angiogenesis inhibitor manufactured by Parke-Davis, requiring only a minimal dosage to produce the same effect as Suramin. A comparable result, in terms of dosages, was obtained when philinopside A was compared against 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), a popular chemotherapeutic agent7.

Further studies revealed that philinopside A is able to shrink mouse sarcoma 180 tumor tissues by inducing apoptosis, or cell death. It produced a 10-fold increase in apoptopic endothelial cells and a 9-fold increase in apoptopic tumor cells compared to the untreated tissues. A similar degree of tumor shrinkage was observed using 5-FU but a much higher concentration (at least 12 times more than philinopside A) was needed. In addition, both compounds operate through different modalities: philinopside A through apoptosis of tumor and endothelial cells and 5-FU through cytotoxicity of tumor cells7. The method by which it reduces tumor size is what sets philinopside A, and other angiogenesis inhibitors, apart from other cancer treatments. By inducing apoptosis of tumor and endothelial cells, treatment is localized and damage to the surrounding healthy cells is minimized. Chemotherapeutic agents and/or radiation, on the other hand, directly kills both healthy and cancer cells (cytotoxicity) and generates more physiological side effects.

Perhaps the most novel function of philinopside A is its ability to inhibit RTK binding. It has been previously mentioned that shutting off the switch close to the source can effectively stop the angiogenesis process. To achieve this, growth factors must be prevented from attaching to their receptors.

There are at least 20 known growth factors associated with angiogenesis, each with its own corresponding receptor(s)8. Some of these growth factors include the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF). The type of growth factors produced and their degree of responsiveness to receptors can vary from tumor to tumor. For example, VEGF is highly expressed in solid tumors-- such as in breast cancer, gliomas, and gastrointestinal cancer-- and attaches to the receptor fetal liver kinase-1 (Flk-1), among other receptors. By interfering with the stimuli at the receptor site, VEGF-RTK inhibitors can stop further tumor growth in these types of cancer.

The studies on Philinopside A determined that it is able to stop the signaling caused by the binding of VEGF, FGF, PDGF and EGF to their corresponding receptors (Flk-1, FGFR-1, PDGFR-b, and EGFR, respectively). Two other angiogenesis inhibitors, PD153035 and SU5416, were also tested. Results indicate that PD153035 inhibits the EGF receptor (EGFR) alone. Similarly, SU5416, manufactured by Pfizer, only inhibits the Flk-1 tyrosine kinase. It was concluded that because growth factors tend to critically overlap, inhibition of one RTK alone might not be enough to sufficiently block RTK signaling. Philinopside A, with its inhibition of all four tested RTKs, might possibly prove to be a more effective RTK inhibitor than other compounds. And with a lethal dose (LD50) of 625 mg/kg orally in mice, it might also be a safer alternative than chemotherapy and/or radiation7.

 

Discussion

The inhibition of angiogenesis now seems like the most logical and valuable tool in the fight against cancer. Yet when it was first hypothesized in 1971 by Dr. Judah Folkman that tumor growth depends on new blood vessel formation, it was considered heresy by scientists9. Through continuing research by him and others who believed in his hypothesis, angiogenesis inhibition has been firmly established as an innovative cancer therapy and has led to the development of angiogenesis and RTK inhibitor drugs-- collectively known as targeted therapies-- by various pharmaceutical companies worldwide.

In 2004, the first angiogenesis inhibitor drug was approved for use in the United States. Although not the first targeted therapy drug approved, Avastin (bevacizumab), is the first drug proven to actually delay tumor growth by targeting the VEGF tyrosine kinase, which is mainly responsible for vascular growth. Manufactured by Genentech, Avastin works in combination with standard chemotherapy drugs like the Saltz regimen (a combination of three drugs: irinotecan, 5-FU and leucovorin). Patients who received both Avastin and the Saltz regimen were found to survive 5 months longer than those who received the Saltz regimen alone10.

Although Avastin is technically the first angiogenesis inhibitor, there are other drugs that belong to a class called tyrosine kinase inhibitors (or RTK inhibitors). Unlike Avastin, these drugs have not been shown to starve tumors and induce apoptosis. Rather they interfere with the growth factor-to-receptor signaling that facilitates the proliferation of the cancer. In a way, they indirectly influence angiogenesis inhibition. Gleevec (imatinib mesylate) is a drug manufactured by Novartis used to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) by blocking the Bcr-Abl tyrosine. In studies, patients have a 76% response rate to Gleevec compared to interferon, the standard CML treatment, which has a 12% response rate. Gleevec also works as a PDGFR inhibitor for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), a rare form of stomach cancer. Additional studies have found that within two years of using Gleevec, GIST patients develop a 75% resistance to it11.

Three other RTK inhibitor drugs, Tarceva (erlotinib), Iressa (gefitinib) and Erbitux (cetuximab), block the EGF tyrosine kinase. The first two are used to treat non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) while Erbitux is indicated for advanced colorectal cancer. Tarceva, manufactured by OSI Pharmaceuticals, was found to have an overall survival of 6.7 months12. Both Iressa, manufactured by AstraZeneca, and Erbitux, manufactured by Imclone Systems, have not been shown to prolong survival although some patients have responded to the treatment. In clinical trials, Iressa caused significant tumor shrinkage in about 10% of lung cancer patients13. Erbitux produced a 10.8% tumor response rate among colorectal cancer patients14.

These are just examples of a growing class of drugs that can be collectively called "smart bombs" -- a reference to the selective way these drugs target cancer cells and minimize damage to healthy cells15. And now this term not only refers to synthetic drugs but to naturally occurring compounds like philinopside A in special sea cucumbers as well. Based on evidence just presented, philinopside A may be a more relevant cancer therapeutic agent than the enumerated drugs because of its dual role as an anti-angiogenic agent and RTK inhibitor.

In its function as an angiogenesis inhibitor, philinopside A has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation, cell migration and tube formation -- three of the most important stages in angiogenesis. Evidence also suggests that treatment with philinopside A caused tumor shrinkage and apoptosis without any effect on normal cells. This is the very essence of targeted therapy: confining the treatment to the diseased area.

Philinopside A's broad range of RTK inhibitory effect is an important factor that makes it potentially more effective than Gleevec, Iressa, Erbitux or Tarceva. Angiogenesis is a complex process that likely involves multiple RTK signaling pathways. Inhibition of one RTK, therefore, may not be able to fully suppress angiogenesis. A concrete example to illustrate this point is the inhibitory effect of Gleevec on GIST patients. In approximately 10% of GIST cases that are attributed to abnormal PDGF tyrosine kinase signaling, Gleevec has been shown to have favorable results. More recent studies, however, have found that after a year or two of treatment, these GIST patients develop resistance to it. There may be other factors that lead to the drug resistance but a prevailing theory is that inhibiting PDGFR alone may not be enough to stop the tumor from growing. A Pfizer drug, Sutent (also known as SU11248), currently in clinical trials, has been shown to benefit 65% of GIST patients resistant to Gleevec. Although Gleevec and Sutent are both RTK inhibitors, Sutent targets several more RTKs than Gleevec: VEGFR, PDGFR-µ and PDGFR-b, Flt3 and C-kit16. This suggests that therapies that target a wide range of RTKs will provide more effective and long-term anti-angiogenic effects than those that target a limited number of growth factor receptors.

Similarly, philinopside A's inhibition of four different RTKs (Flk-1 or the VEGF receptor, FGFR-1, PDGFR-b , and EGFR) puts it in a very viable position as a more robust RTK inhibitor than drugs of a similar function. And with strong evidence of philinopside A's inhibition of angiogenesis and induction of apoptosis, sea cucumbers are a very promising natural cancer therapy alternative to current conventional cancer treatments-- able to potentially block all five important processes involved in cancer: angiogenesis, apoptosis inhibition, proliferation, invasion and metastasis.

 

REFERENCES

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

Bring A Friend - ANMA will waive the registration fee

American Naturopathic Medical Association is an organization of which you can be proud to recommend to a friend. Chances are you may know at least one fellow naturopath who is not a member of ANMA. This opportunity will benefit you both. As a member in good standing when you register for the convention, ANMA will waive the registration fee for that colleague to come with you. If that colleague then becomes a member, ANMA will credit you $150.00 toward your membership for the following year.

 

24th Annual Convention & Educational Presentation

Friday, Saturday, Sunday July 29, 30, & 31, 2005

Activities begin Friday morning at 8:00 a.m. and end Sunday at 3:00 p.m.

RIVIERA HOTEL & CASINO - Las Vegas, Nevada

For Hotel Registration: 1-800-634-6753 or 1-702-794-9412

Room Rate: $79.00 per night (single/double) code American Naturopathic Medical Assoc.

**Make Reservations Early - Deadline for Rooms at the Special Rate is July 13, 2005**

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

 

A Call For Validated Research Papers
Dealing With Alternative/Naturopathic Health Care
 

? Are you a Natural Health Care Professional with a Research paper or Article that you would like to publish?

? Are you a Naturopathic or Natural Health Care student with an excellent class project / or thesis?

? Are you an instructor teaching the most current natural healthcare skills?

GET ON TARGET FOR 2005

The ANMA Monitor is a widely distributed newsletter to healthcare professionals and naturopathic students. If you would like to submit an article, or know of someone that would be interested, now is the time to do so!

You are invited to submit an article or case study to be featured in the ANMA Monitor.

Submit your article according to the following standards:

The ANMA Monitor is published quarterly by ANMA, P.O. Box 96273, Las Vegas, Nevada 89193 (702) 897-7053. Deadlines for articles and advertisements are November 20, March 20, June 20, and September 20 . Please submit articles on a IBM compatible 3.5" disk or by e-mail to webmaster@anma.com, clearly identified as an article for the ANMA Monitor. The editor reserves the right to edit any portion of an article before publishing. The editor also reserves the right to refuse articles which he deems inappropriate for this publication.

We appreciate those who have already sent in articles.

Take advantage of this opportunity to be in print!

 

 

The views and opinions expressed in this online newsletter are not necessarily those of the American Naturopathic Medical Association, its officers or its members, nor are they necessarily in accordance or agreement with its policies.

ANMA
P.O. Box 96273
Las Vegas, Nevada 89193
Telephone (702) 897-7053    Fax (702) 897-7140